Liquidity & Technical

Figures converted from INR at historical FX rates — see data/company.json.fx_rates. Ratios, margins, and multiples are unitless and unchanged.

Liquidity & Technical

TVS Holdings trades a 20-day average of only 4,098 shares ($0.61 million of value per session) against a $2.83 billion market cap — a 0.02% daily float turn that makes this name capacity-constrained for any institutional fund above a few million dollars of position size. The tape is correcting inside a multi-year uptrend: price has slipped 3% under the 200-day even though the most recent 50/200 golden cross from July 2025 is still in place, and momentum has rolled hard (RSI 37, MACD histogram deepening to −88).

5-day capacity at 20% ADV ($M)

0.61

Largest issuer position cleared in 5d (% mcap)

0.021

Fund AUM supporting 5% position ($M)

12.1

ADV 20d / market cap (%)

0.0214

Technical stance score (−3 to +3)

-1

Price snapshot

Last price ($)

139.92

YTD return

-3.2

1-year return

50.9

52-week position (0=low, 100=high)

61.3

Realized vol 30d

24.8

A +51% one-year return with the stock at the 61st percentile of its 52-week range tells you the giant move happened months ago and the recent tape is digesting — not the entry window the headline number suggests.

Ten-year tape with 50/200-day SMAs

Loading...

Price is below the 200-day by 3.0% as of 18 May 2026. The regime since 2024 has been a strong uptrend (the stock went from $96 to a 2025 high of $169 in roughly twelve months) that is now in a corrective phase. The golden cross is intact, but the price-vs-200d gap has compressed to where a one-week swing in either direction will decide whether the cross holds.

Relative strength

Loading...

Benchmark series unavailable in this run — broad-market (INDA) and sector (BSE Financial Services) overlays could not be loaded. Read the line as absolute total return rather than alpha vs. the index.

In absolute terms the stock has compounded at a punishing rate (rebased index from 100 to ~399 in three years), but the line has been making lower highs since the October-2025 peak. Even without a benchmark overlay, the deceleration is visible — the slope of the curve flattened sharply after the 449 print and has since rolled over.

Momentum — RSI(14) and MACD histogram

Loading...
Loading...

RSI printed 37.5 on 18 May (latest daily value) after rolling over from a high of 80 last May — momentum is decelerating but not yet at the 30-line oversold zone that has produced bounces in this stock. The MACD line is deeply below signal (−122 vs −34) with the histogram widening to its most negative print since the November 2025 sell-off, a textbook "trend-down, momentum-deepening" configuration that historically has resolved with one more leg lower before reversing.

Volume, volatility, and sponsorship

Loading...

The 50-day rolling average volume has compressed from roughly 11,000 shares in mid-2025 to 6,100 shares as of mid-May 2026 — a 45% collapse in sponsorship even as price held in a broad range. The last two weekly samples printed only ~2,100 shares per session, the thinnest sustained tape in the window. Combined with falling price, this is the wrong kind of confirmation: shrinking participation into a downtrend, no contrarian buying showing up in the book.

No Results

The two most recent spikes — 15 Mar 2024 (17.9× on a flat tape) and 1 Jan 2025 (14.7× on a −12.2% day) — both came on days where price moved down or sideways, suggesting institutional unwinds rather than accumulation prints. Catalyst column omitted: the web-research corpus did not produce a one-to-one news match for these dates, and labelling them speculatively would be dishonest.

Loading...

Realized 30-day volatility is 24.8% — sitting in the "normal" zone between the 10-year 20th and 80th percentiles (21.6% / 39.8%). The market is not yet pricing crisis-level risk, but vol has been creeping up since April and remains roughly 1.5× the level of comparable mid-cap Indian financial holding companies — a structural premium that reflects the thin float, not stress.

Institutional liquidity

This is the section that decides whether a fund can do anything with this name. Read it before the technical scorecard.

A. ADV & turnover

ADV 20-day (shares)

4,098

ADV 20-day ($M)

0.61

ADV 60-day (shares)

6,888

ADV 20d / market cap

0.0214

Annual share turnover

5.1

For reference, a "tradable" Indian mid-cap typically clears 0.1% to 0.5% of market cap daily and turns over 30% to 100% of its shares annually. TVS Holdings clears 0.02% and turns over 5%. This is roughly an order of magnitude below the institutional threshold.

B. Fund-capacity table

No Results

Read the right-hand columns. At 20% participation — already aggressive for an Indian small-mid cap — a 5% portfolio weight is implementable for funds up to $12.1 million. A 2% portfolio weight scales to $30.3 million. Anything larger and you become a multi-week price-driver every time you enter or exit.

C. Liquidation runway

No Results

Exit math is the killer. A 1% issuer-level position — what a long-term fund might want for a high-conviction holding — needs 247 trading days at 20% participation, basically an entire trading year, to liquidate. At a more realistic 10% participation it's two years. A trim into a stress event would by definition be a price-driving event.

D. Execution friction

Median daily price range over the last 60 sessions is 2.85% of close — above the 2% threshold at which large block prints start to materially eat into entry prices. Combined with the volume profile, expect implementation slippage of 50–100 bps per side at typical mid-cap pension-fund order sizes.

Bottom line: the largest issuer position a fund can build or exit within five trading days at 20% ADV is roughly 0.02% of market cap ($0.6 million); even at 10% ADV the figure is half that. Liquidity is unambiguously the constraint here.

Technical scorecard

No Results

Sum: −1. A constructive long-term trend that is rolling over in the short term, with collapsing volume confirming the move down and momentum offering no bottom signal yet.

Stance — neutral-to-bearish on 3-to-6 months

The setup reads as a corrective leg inside a multi-year uptrend that is not yet finished correcting. Momentum is bearish and deepening, sponsorship is fading, and the only structural positive (a still-intact golden cross) is one bad week away from being revoked — SMA50 and SMA200 are only 1.6% apart and converging. Liquidity is the constraint, not the technicals: the right action for a multi-hundred-million-dollar fund is avoid or watchlist only until either the tape resolves higher or the float deepens (neither is in our hands). A small specialist book can build slowly on weakness toward $130, but participation must stay well under 10% of session volume to avoid moving the print.

Two levels that change the view:

  • Upside trigger — close above $148.43. That clears the 100-day SMA ($148.71) and the 50-day SMA ($146.62) in one move, re-engages the post-golden-cross uptrend, and turns the MACD histogram back to neutral. This is the level that converts the stance from neutral-to-bearish back to constructive.
  • Downside trigger — close below $129.75. That breaks the late-March / late-April swing-low band, pulls SMA50 through SMA200 to print a death cross within two-to-four weeks, and opens a path back to the December 2024 ~$110 – early-2025 ~$94 zone. This is the level that confirms the bearish case and would make even watchlist exposure premature.

Liquidity is the constraint. For any fund above ~$30 million AUM that needs more than a 2% portfolio weight, no technical setup — bullish or bearish — makes this name implementable. Pass at the institutional desk; small books only.